Saturday, November 12, 2005
Another Stop On The Hypocrisy Express
Rick Santorum thinks medical malpractice awards should be limited...unless they're his own. (CNN photo)
True to his party, Rick Santorum is the latest Republican to believe in a double standard. After some investigative journalism by ABC, Santorum is now having to defend his hypocrisy on the issue of medical malpractice lawsuits.
Republicans like to call the issue tort reform. Saying it's a drain on the healthcare industry, Republicans believe that the ability to file lawsuits against healthcare providers should be limited. GOPers also advocate limits on the amount of monetary damages plaintiffs can win in medical malpractice lawsuits.
As reported by ABC, Santorum says:
"... that the No. 1 health care crisis in his state is medical lawsuit abuse and in the past he's called for a $250,000 cap on non-economic damage awards or awards for pain and suffering. "We need to do something now to fix the medical liability problem in this country," he declared at a rally in Washington D.C., this past spring.
But Santorum's wife sued a doctor for $500,000 in 1999. She claimed that a botched spinal manipulation by her chiropractor led to back surgery, pain and suffering, and sued for twice the amount of a cap Santorum has supported.
Santorum declined a request for an interview, so "Primetime" caught up with him at the signing of his new book in Pennsylvania this August to ask if he thinks his stance and history are in conflict.
"I guess I could answer that in two ways," he said. "Number one is that I've supported caps. I've been very clear that I am not wedded at all to a $250,000 cap and I've said publicly repeatedly, and I think probably that is somewhat low, and that we need to look at what I think is a cap that is a little bit higher than that."
But the fact is that Santorum has sponsored or co-sponsored a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages two times  even though he testified in his wife's case against the doctor.
"Of course I'm going to support my wife in her endeavors," he said. "That doesn't necessarily mean that I agree with everything that she does."
But Santorum agreed enough to tell the jury that he had to carry the laundry upstairs for his wife and that, because she suffered humiliation from weight gain, she no longer had the confidence to help him on the campaign trail. The jury was so moved it voted to award Karen Santorum $350,000."
I'm not sure which bothers me more: Santorum's hypocrisy, or that he would actually complain in open court about having to carry laundry upstairs for his wife. If you'll read the entire article, you'll notice that even his claims of lost income are bogus. That's Republicanism for you.
