.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Tuesday, March 29, 2005

 

Proving The Former Trifecta?

As you've read by now, I (along with a few other bloggers) believe that three local attorneys were hatching a scheme to control local government and abuse party titles.

A story in the March 24 edition of the Columbus Commercial Dispatch adds some fuel to that fire.

* * * * *

Two candidates withdraw from municipal elections

By Valerie Clark
Dispatch Starkville Bureau
vclark@cdispatch.com

STARKVILLE -- Two candidates who qualified to run for public office this spring have withdrawn their candidacy.

Local attorney Brian Kelley, who qualified to run as a Democrat in Ward 4 against incumbent Lee Beck, a Republican, has opted not to seek office.

Kelly said he decided to end his candidacy because two of the partners in his law firm also were running for public office.

Jeff Hosford qualified to run as a Republican in Ward 7, and Scott Ross is running against West Point Mayor Kenny Dill.

"It was too big of a burden on the law firm with all three of us running at the same time," Kelly said. [emphasis added]

Kelley said he still would like to run for office sometime in the future.

Former Mississippi State football player John Bond is running in Ward 4 as a Republican, and MSU student Richard Corey is running as a Democrat.

[story continues]

* * * * *

In other news from the Ward 4 race, the two active candidates (John Bond has yet to do anything that suggests he's actually campaigning) answered a series of questions that appeared in the Columbus Commercial Dispatch yesterday.

Incumbent Lee Beck came out like an Alderman who hasn't been paying much attention over the last for years. Two quotes of note:
  1. "Starkville is a growing, booming town, and I want to be a part of it."
  2. "Signs should welcome visitors to Starkville and the university, rather than simply boast of the town being a certified retirement community."

Beck's first quote suggests he hasn't been a part of what's happened in the last four years. If that's the case, then where has he been?

As for the signs, they already exist. Large, oval-shaped, maroon signs read "Welcome to the City of Starkville" and tout the city as the "Home of Mississippi State University." They can be easily seen on Highways 12, 25, and 82.

Richard Corey, on the other hand, expressed clear plans and intentions for the city.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am most certainly biased (as I am toward all Democrats), but I encourage you to read the interviews and form your own decision.


Comments:
"What goes on in West Point has no bearing in Starkville."

Not true. Each of the cities that form the Golden Triangle are involved in a number of interdependent contractual obligations. The GTR airport, Eurocoper, and SteelCor are only a few. Each city's government, and the relations between them, affect those obligations and the shared tax dollars that fund them.

"Analyze realities and not cooked up conspiracies."

Reality: three parterns of the same law firm are seeking municipal elected office, each with the potential to affect the other.

Analysis: it's certainly worth questioning their motives, if nothing else.

We do agree on one point. Hosford has no chance in Ward 7.
 
Mr. Melder, my name is Brian Kelley and as you know you have never met me, Scott Ross or Jeff Hosford, yet you continue in an effort to sling mud our way. It would seem that someone as politically active as yourself would appreciate others that are politically involved in an effort to make their respective cities better.

You have got to get those snakes out of your head! ". . .control local government and abuse party titles". Get off of that spaceship and join us down here. At the very least, do a little research before you speak out loud. Scott Ross was serving numerous years in the Mississippi House of Representatives while you were still in diapers. He ran for mayor of West Point 8 years ago and lost by under 50 votes. He was appointed to the College Board by Governor Musgrove where he has dutifully served the past several years. All this before I even knew his name, yet alone was his law partner.

As for Jeff, Scott and I had no idea he was even thinking about running for public office until the final day of qualifying. In a ward that was created as a result of a lawsuit alleging lack of black representation, Jeff is aware that his chances of winning are slim to none as a relatively unknown white republican. He has chosen to use the opportunity to raise some issues he feels need to be dealt with in that particular ward.

As for me, Scott certainly encouraged me to run just as Scott encourages all young civic minded citizens that he feels will contribute to the betterment of society to do. Do you honestly believe that had I stayed in the race and won along with Scott winning the West Point mayoral race (both of which would be heavy assumptions) that would constitute a takeover of local government and abuse of party titles. What planet are you writing this blog from? Please explain how a single alderman and a mayor in towns 20 miles apart can take over local government.

At the very least, have the ambition to do a little research before just rambling off nonsense.

Brian Kelley
 
Mr. Kelley:

Allow me to take your response point by point.

"and as you know you have never met me, Scott Ross or Jeff Hosford, yet you continue in an effort to sling mud our way."

You're right. I do not know any of you, although I am well aware of Scott Ross in his role on the IHL board and his previous attempt at running for West Point Mayor. That's one of the reasons for my concern. Having been heavily involved in Mississippi politics during my time at State, I have never heard of you in particular. If I don't know a candidate, it's probably because that person doesn't have much history with the Democratic party. If you have no history with the Democratic party, I cannot be assured of your committment to it. As for continuing in any effort to sling mud at you, look again. This will be my third writing on the subject. I am only posing questions. Now, thanks to you, I have some answers.

"It would seem that someone as politically active as yourself would appreciate others that are politically involved in an effort to make their respective cities better."

I most certainly do. If that was your intention, more power to you. That said, three law partners running at the same time for related offices does seem at least worthy of asking about. You have now attempted to answer my questions.

"You have got to get those snakes out of your head! '. . .control local government and abuse party titles.' Get off of that spaceship and join us down here. At the very least, do a little research before you speak out loud. Scott Ross was serving numerous years in the Mississippi House of Representatives while you were still in diapers. He ran for mayor of West Point 8 years ago and lost by under 50 votes. He was appointed to the College Board by Governor Musgrove where he has dutifully served the past several years. All this before I even knew his name, yet alone was his law partner."

I do not discredit Scott Ross for his service in the House or on the IHL board. The fact remains, as I have researched and shown in my earlier posts, that he has given signficant monetary contributions to Republicans. As a Democrat, this is most troubling to me. As for you, when I first heard of your candidacy, and because I hadn't heard of you, I began asking people who live in Ward 4 about you. Everyone that claims to know you also claims you are a Republican. If that's not true, take it up with them.

"As for Jeff, Scott and I had no idea he was even thinking about running for public office until the final day of qualifying. In a ward that was created as a result of a lawsuit alleging lack of black representation, Jeff is aware that his chances of winning are slim to none as a relatively unknown white republican. He has chosen to use the opportunity to raise some issues he feels need to be dealt with in that particular ward."

While I am fully aware of how Ward 7 came to be, I have no knowledge of Hosford's intentions. Again, I was asking the question. Now, I have an answer. I hope it's the truth.

"As for me, Scott certainly encouraged me to run just as Scott encourages all young civic minded citizens that he feels will contribute to the betterment of society to do. Do you honestly believe that had I stayed in the race and won along with Scott winning the West Point mayoral race (both of which would be heavy assumptions) that would constitute a takeover of local government and abuse of party titles."

As I have previously explained, I believe that your lack of history with the Democratic party and Scott Ross's contributions to the Republicans do indeed suggest that you will be less than loyal to the Democratic party.

"What planet are you writing this blog from? Please explain how a single alderman and a mayor in towns 20 miles apart can take over local government. "

I am writing from Durant, Oklahoma, United State of America, North America, Earth. Having left State, that's where I live and work now. As for how a "single alderman and a mayor in towns 20 miles apart can take over," my answer remains the same as I gave to Edward Sanders. "Each of the cities that form the Golden Triangle are involved in a number of interdependent contractual obligations. The GTR airport, Eurocoper, and SteelCor are only a few. Each city's government, and the relations between them, affect those obligations and the shared tax dollars that fund them."

"At the very least, have the ambition to do a little research before just rambling off nonsense."

One more time, I have done research into your party involvement...or lack thereof. What you call nonsense I call a question that I wanted answered. Now, you have. My goals are met.

Thanks for your time.
 
Mr. Melder:

". . .I believe that three local attorneys were hatching a scheme to control local government and abuse party titles."

That, Daniel, is a statement. An incorrect, biased, misguided statement, but a statement nonetheless. I may have provided you with some correct factual information, but not due to any questions you asked in your article.

What your article consist of is simply hairbrained conspiracy theories with no factual content whatsoever.

Brian Kelley
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?